****

The House Ethics Committee is facing significant pressure regarding their decision on whether to release a long-awaited report into allegations of misconduct by Matt Gaetz. As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to assume office, the report's potential release threatens to stir controversy and challenge the Committee's credibility.

Members of the historically bipartisan committee are caught in a difficult position: if they release the report, they risk incurring Trump's disapproval. On the other hand, withholding it could lead to accusations of concealing potentially damaging information about Gaetz, who is a nominee for attorney general. The situation is made even more precarious by the fact that leaking the report could undermine the Committee's reputational integrity, which is already viewed by many as largely ineffective, owing to its slow and often inconclusive reports on member misconduct.

Adding to the complexity, Speaker Mike Johnson has expressed his opposition to the report’s release, despite indicating a few days earlier that he was not involved in the decision-making process. Johnson articulated his stance to reporters, suggesting that issuing the report would set a "terrible precedent."

Members of the committee, including Rep. Deborah Ross and Chair Michael Guest, have declined to discuss the content or the status of the Gaetz report publicly. However, it has been confirmed that a previously scheduled meeting to deliberate the report was postponed, with a new date yet to be announced. The panel is deliberating amidst internal and external pressures, particularly after the Department of Justice concluded its investigation without pressing charges against Gaetz.

Internal divides are also evident among House Republicans. Some, who are friends and allies of Gaetz, argue against releasing the report, dismissing it as a politically motivated attack. Other Republicans, including notable members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, insist the report should be shared, especially considering Gaetz's nomination for attorney general. They argue that public transparency is essential for such a significant role.

Historically, the Committee has sometimes released reports on members who have resigned, but there is no actual rule preventing it from doing so. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, alongside other top Democrats, have shown interest in seeing the report but defer the ultimate decision to the panel's members.

As tensions mount, the House Ethics Committee's decision could have wide-reaching implications not only for Matt Gaetz's confirmation process but also for the perceived integrity and future conduct of congressional oversight.