****

As the uncertainty around President-elect Trump's Cabinet picks builds, Republicans find themselves debating the constitutionality and implications of Trump possibly making controversial recess appointments. A controversial strategy seriously considered within Trump's circle could entail forcibly adjourning Congress if the Senate does not agree to recess, leveraging Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution.

The withdrawal of former Rep. Matt Gaetz from consideration for attorney general has temporarily alleviated some concerns among GOP senators, signaling they won't always align with Trump's choices. However, other divisive candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Health and Human Services secretary and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence remain prospective nominees.

The contentious plan hinges on the House agreeing to recess, and if the Senate does not act, Trump could use his constitutional authority to adjourn Congress "to such time as he shall think proper." This possibility is creating unease among Republicans, who fear a potential constitutional crisis and the long-term precedent it could set.

Republicans, aware that political roles could reverse, express caution about establishing such a precedent. "This is a bad strategy to go down," remarked one House Republican to The Hill, emphasizing the potential consequences if Democrats gain power.

Several Republican senators have voiced skepticism. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) emphasized the principle of separation of powers, declaring that "one branch can't commandeer the other two." The likely aim of this controversial strategy appears to be pressuring Senate Republicans to confirm Trump's nominees quickly, rather than face a messy confrontation.

While some of Trump's allies defend the strategy, claiming it is within his constitutional authority, notable constitutional experts differ. Ed Whelan from the Ethics and Public Policy Center argues that the scheme wouldn't work as the Senate controls its session decisions. Similarly, Andy Craig from the Cato Institute warned it would be "unconstitutional" and lead to a "full-blown constitutional crisis."

On the other hand, a paper from the Center for Renewing America, a group with Trump supporters, argues that Trump holds broad authority to declare a recess. Rep. Andy Harris of the House Freedom Caucus echoed this sentiment, stating the move is "absolutely constitutional."

Amid these conflicting views, Speaker Mike Johnson has chosen not to dismiss the scenario outright, emphasizing the tradition of recess appointments but calling for the Senate to confirm nominees expediently. Nonetheless, with the House's slim majority, Johnson's ability to support such a move remains uncertain.