In a surprising turn of events, Benny Gantz, the leader of a large centrist alliance, announced his decision to join Binyamin Netanyahu in a unity government back in 2020, during the height of the covid-19 pandemic. Gantz, who had initially promised not to serve under Netanyahu, cited the need for national unity and shared responsibility as the driving force behind his controversial decision.

The partnership between Gantz and Netanyahu was hailed as a significant move towards stability and cooperation in difficult times. However, their alliance was short-lived, lasting only seven months before tensions between the two politicians simmered and finally broke down.

Gantz, a former high-ranking military official who often employs military idioms in his rhetoric, likened his decision to "going under the stretcher." This phrase symbolizes the idea that everyone must bear the weight of the national burden, suggesting that Gantz, too, was willing to make personal sacrifices for the greater good of the country.

The unity government, formed amidst the raging pandemic, faced numerous challenges and criticisms from various political factions. While some praised Gantz for putting aside his differences with Netanyahu in the name of national unity, others questioned the sincerity of his actions, accusing him of political opportunism.

Now, as renewed violence escalates between Israel and Palestine, the question arises: Will the current situation finally force Netanyahu to consider pushing for a ceasefire? Gantz, with his firsthand experience in both military and political realms, could potentially play a crucial role in influencing such a decision.

As the conflict intensifies and civilian casualties mount, the international community watches closely for signs of de-escalation. The demands for a ceasefire grow louder by the day, adding pressure on Netanyahu to act swiftly. Whether the ongoing crisis will prompt Netanyahu to reconsider his stance and seek a path towards peace remains to be seen.

Meanwhile, Gantz's decision to join Netanyahu's government serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in political alliances and the delicate balance between personal convictions and national interests. While Gantz's initial willingness to set aside his differences was praised, the breakdown of the alliance highlights the challenges in maintaining unity in the face of conflicting agendas.

As the situation continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how Gantz and Netanyahu's political fortunes will be affected by their past alliance. The outcome of these events could have far-reaching implications for both the political landscape in Israel and the pursuit of a lasting peace in the region.