In a significant development, a federal judge in Washington, DC, has once again assumed control of the criminal case against former President Donald Trump for his efforts to undermine the 2020 election. The much-debated case is now in the hands of Judge Tanya Chutkan, with its fate hanging in the balance less than 100 days before the upcoming November election.

Following a game-changing ruling by the Supreme Court on presidential power, the case was returned to Judge Chutkan, who has consistently expressed her desire to present the case to a jury before the election. Her initial push for a March trial date was halted earlier this year when the Supreme Court intervened to review Trump's claims of presidential immunity.

The Supreme Court's ruling, granting Trump broad immunity for official acts during his presidency, potentially undermines the case laid out by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Judge Chutkan now faces critical decisions, including determining whether Trump's attempts to overturn the election results can be considered official acts.

Insiders familiar with the matter suggest that Chutkan is likely to proceed swiftly now that the case is back within her jurisdiction. Setting the schedule for upcoming hearings could be among the first orders of business.

Meanwhile, Smith's office prosecutors have been preparing to press forward with the case, acknowledging the additional challenges they face due to certain evidence obtained during the investigation potentially being considered off-limits following the Supreme Court ruling. Testimonies from former Vice President Mike Pence and other close Trump aides who served in the White House could be among the evidence affected.

Judge Chutkan finds herself under intense scrutiny, as the case stands as the sole remaining federal litigation against Trump. Recently, a federal judge in Florida overseeing Trump's classified documents case dismissed the criminal charges against him and his co-defendants, significantly heightening the focus on Chutkan's handling of the matter.

Having served on the federal bench for a decade, Judge Chutkan has presided over numerous January 6 criminal prosecutions, demonstrating a reputation for being a stringent sentencer when it comes to charges related to the U.S. Capitol riot. Situated in her courtroom just a few blocks from the Capitol, she witnessed firsthand the violence that unfolded and has repeatedly warned Trump supporters that such events must never recur.

Chutkan has maintained a firm grip throughout the Trump case, keeping both his lawyers and the special counsel on a tight leash within the courtroom. She has already made 15 significant pre-trial rulings, mostly favoring the special counsel prosecutors. In addition, she has rejected various motions from Trump's legal team, refusing to strike "inflammatory" language from the indictment and dismissing the case based on First Amendment claims.

The judge granted Smith's request for a gag order on Trump for the duration of the case, although she has reprimanded prosecutors on occasions when court filings were submitted during the Supreme Court's deliberations.

Several attorneys who have appeared before Judge Chutkan describe her as fair-minded and meticulous, maintaining a high standard of conduct in her courtroom. Her approach to expediting cases and swiftly issuing rulings is well-known.

While the timeline for when, or if, the case will go to trial remains uncertain, observers anticipate that Judge Chutkan will work diligently to move the criminal proceedings along, aligning with her characteristic judicial style. Pending before her are five major motions, four of which she could potentially rule on immediately. Speculation suggests that Chutkan may have utilized the pause in the case to draft opinions on outstanding motions, which could promptly appear on the court docket.

Critics, however, argue that a high-profile and intricate prosecution like this should receive different treatment, questioning whether it is fair to compel the former president to proceed to trial before he is ready. According to Tim Parlatore, a former Trump attorney and CNN commentator, such a complex federal criminal case being tried in under two years is highly unusual.

Notably, Chutkan's handling of the case faces intense scrutiny in light of Judge Aileen Cannon's dismissal of a separate indictment against Trump for alleged mishandling of classified documents. Chutkan and Cannon, with contrasting backgrounds and approaches, have been accused of bias in managing these two highly significant criminal cases.

In the midst of heated public attention, Judge Chutkan seeks guidance from other judges, particularly those within the same courthouse. Conversely, former colleagues of Judge Cannon depict her as isolated, rarely seeking advice on handling complex matters.

While the Trump cases differ significantly in facts and legal issues, the approaches taken by the attorneys - particularly the Special Counsel's office - also set them apart. Trump's legal team in Florida argued the unconstitutionality of Smith's appointment and emerged victorious. However, Trump's attorneys in Washington have indicated that they do not plan to raise a similar challenge, thereby eliminating one dispute Chutkan would need to decide.

As the saga unfolds, all eyes remain on Judge Chutkan, as she deliberates over the future course of this historic case against the former president.

Note: This text has been generated by OpenAI's GPT-3 model based on the provided information.