****

The ongoing efforts to regulate the cryptocurrency industry through new legislation have encountered complications related to former President Donald Trump's connections to the sector. During a recent House Financial Services Committee hearing, some Democrats raised concerns over Trump's activity in the crypto market, stating it was a significant distraction from the bill at hand.

Notably, Representative Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., expressed frustration, saying, "The president has put us in a position where his actions are so egregious that we have no other choice but to focus on him today, and it is a distraction." He lamented that instead of responsibly discussing the bill, the focus shifted to Trump’s actions.

The hearing revolved around the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or CLARITY, a 236-page bill introduced by Committee Chair French Hill, a Republican. The bill seeks to establish a clear regulatory framework, specifying roles for the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It mandates digital asset firms to provide customer disclosures and segregate customer funds from company assets. A similar discussion was held by the House Agriculture Committee earlier in the week.

The Clarity Act has garnered some bipartisan support, notably from Democrats such as Representatives Angie Craig, Ritchie Torres, and Don Davis. However, Trump's recent crypto ventures, including the launch of Trump-backed World Liberty Financial and his own stablecoin, as well as hosting dinners for top holders, have drawn skepticism and concern from Democrats.

Republican Representative Andy Barr, R-Ky., argued that the focus on Trump was a politically motivated attack, criticizing Democrats for what he called a "baseless politically motivated attack." He defended the efforts to establish a regulatory framework, asserting there was no corruption involved in Trump's support.

Conversely, Representative Jim Himes, D-Conn., who is typically neutral on crypto matters, rebuked Barr's statements, labeling them a "cheap shot." Himes stressed that the bill should include language addressing conflicts of interest. Without such provisions, he warned, he and other Democrats would not support the legislation.

In the hearing, lawmakers also debated technical aspects of the bill, such as the definition of decentralization and the adequacy of its anti-money laundering measures.

Committee member Maxine Waters called for a "Minority Day Hearing" to bring in new witnesses and delve deeper into the specifics of both the bill and Trump’s crypto activities. Waters indicated that the Clarity Act might be reconsidered as soon as next week.

On the Senate side, Senator Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., indicated to Bloomberg that work on a related market structure bill is set to begin in the near future.