In a comprehensive analysis conducted by Columbia University Professors Awi Federgruen and Ran Kivetz, it has been affirmed that Gaza has an ample supply of food, debunking claims of a famine in the region. The professors presented their findings to The Jerusalem Post, stating that Israel is not responsible for the alleged food shortage. Their research challenges the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations' claims that blamed Israel for a famine that they argue never existed.

Professor Awi Federgruen, an expert in supply chains and logistics, along with Professor Ran Kivetz, an expert in decision-making, have meticulously examined available data and reports from sources such as COGAT and the UN. Their research refutes allegations that food shortages have been caused by Israel. According to their findings, approximately 250 truckloads of food, equivalent to a normal diet in North America, are sufficient to feed the entire population of Gaza.

Although Hamas temporarily disrupted the border by firing rockets at the Kerem Shalom crossing, resulting in the death of five soldiers, the supply of aid has resumed. Israel is even planning to increase the number of trucks delivering aid to Gaza to 400-500 per day. In an effort to facilitate the distribution of supplies, Israel regularly halts offensives for four hours a day.

However, the professors acknowledge that food distribution within Gaza is not consistent, pointing out reports that suggest Hamas is sabotaging and stealing food aid. They assert that the blame for the situation should be placed on Hamas, who initiated the war with mass slaughter, rape, and kidnapping.

Federgruen and Kivetz argue that the mainstream media has distorted information from Gaza, falsely framing Israel as responsible for the alleged famine, perpetrating genocide, and sabotaging hostage deals with Hamas. According to the professors, these defamatory narratives are intended to end the Israel-Hamas war at any cost, even if it means a victory for Hamas and a bleak future for both Israel and Gaza.

The professors also highlight problematic reports that have contributed to the famine narrative. They point to an organization called the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), which predicted a major famine in Gaza provoked by Israel. The IPC report was cited by OXFAM, accusing Israel of deliberately starving civilians. However, Federgruen and Kivetz argue that their analysis directly contradicts these baseless claims.

Their findings have been independently supported by researchers from various Israeli institutions, including Tel Aviv University, Hebrew University, and Ben-Gurion University. These researchers concluded that each Gazan receives 3,374 Kcal per day, exceeding the required 2,100 Kcal.

While it is evident that enough aid is entering Gaza, the professors recognize that challenges in distribution may arise due to factors such as war and Hamas control. They firmly state that Israel is actively ensuring sufficient food enters Gaza through land crossings.

Despite the mounting evidence against claims of a Gaza famine, Israel continues to be blamed for the situation. Hamas, seizing the opportunity, hijacks aid trucks and capitalizes on the famine narrative to pressure Israel to cease fighting.

In conclusion, the research conducted by Professors Federgruen and Kivetz from Columbia University reinforces the fact that sufficient amounts of food are being supplied into Gaza, disproving claims of a famine caused by Israel. This crucial information challenges the narratives promoted by the ICC, UN, and mainstream media, underscoring the need for accurate reporting and unbiased analysis of the situation in Gaza.