Biden Administration Temporarily Suspends Controversial Migrant Program Due to Fraud Concerns

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16310245/original/open-uri20240802-55-1md2c1w?1722624238
ICARO Media Group
Politics
02/08/2024 18h34

In a recent development, the Biden administration has opted to put a contentious program on hold that allows tens of thousands of migrants from four nations to fly or travel directly into the United States. This decision comes after an internal report surfaced, highlighting significant instances of fraud within the program.

The program, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security's purview, permits up to 30,000 nationals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV) to enter the United States legally each month under specific conditions, making use of the administration's parole policy. However, a congressional source informed Fox News Digital that the administration decided to pause the program in mid-July following the discovery of widespread fraud in applications for sponsoring the program's beneficiaries.

The Department of Homeland Security has expressed its commitment to the detection and prevention of fraud and abuse in the immigration process. They emphasized that their review mechanisms are in place to ensure the integrity of the system. Any identified cases of fraud will be thoroughly investigated and litigated.

The temporary suspension aims to enable the Department of Homeland Security to review sponsor applications more comprehensively. It is worth noting that the pause primarily focuses on issues related to supporter filings, rather than the filings from the beneficiaries themselves.

The program was initially introduced in October 2022 to benefit Venezuelans and was subsequently expanded in January 2023 to include Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Cubans. Participants in the program are required to meet specific criteria, such as having not entered the United States illegally, possessing a sponsor in the country, and passing biometric and biographical vetting.

The internal report, shared by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), revealed alarming patterns of fraud. It identified instances where social security numbers, addresses, and phone numbers were used repeatedly. The report also highlighted the use of deceased individuals' social security numbers and the repetition of physical addresses, including storage units, on multiple forms. Furthermore, some sponsor phone numbers were associated with thousands of forms, and there were numerous instances of non-existent sponsor zip codes.

The Department of Homeland Security maintains that the beneficiaries of the CHNV program undergo thorough screening and vetting procedures before their arrival in the United States. However, the review process for advanced travel authorizations for sponsors is separate and is the subject of the current scrutiny.

The temporary suspension of the program is likely to provoke additional questions from Republicans who assert that the Biden administration's use of parole exceeds its congressionally granted authority, which should be reserved for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefits.

While the Biden administration strives to address the surge in migration, controversies surrounding immigration policies continue to persist. It remains to be seen how the program will adapt and improve to mitigate fraud concerns and ensure the integrity of the immigration system in the future.

The DHS Secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, has recently affirmed that the program provides a safe and organized pathway for migrants to enter the United States, leading to a reduction in overall numbers. Mayorkas believes that other nations view this program as a potential model to tackle the challenge of increased irregular migration.

As of October 2023, there were around 1.6 million applicants awaiting DHS approval to travel to the United States through the parole program. Although a lawsuit challenging the program was dismissed earlier this year, Republican states involved in the case have indicated their intention to appeal the decision.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related