Ben & Jerry's Lawsuit Against Unilever for Alleged Censorship Amid Support for Palestinian Causes

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16399381/original/open-uri20241115-17-7ttit4?1731703589
ICARO Media Group
Politics
15/11/2024 20h33

**Ben & Jerry's Sues Unilever for Alleged Censorship Following Support for Palestinian Causes**

Ben & Jerry's is taking legal action against its parent company, Unilever, claiming that it is being silenced for advocating for Palestinian refugees. The Vermont-based ice cream maker filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York, arguing that Unilever has "threatened Ben & Jerry's personnel" to prevent them from speaking on issues that the parent company prefers to avoid.

In their complaint, Ben & Jerry's emphasized that their merger agreement with Unilever safeguards their ability to maintain their social mission. This mission includes vocal support for causes like migrant justice, LGBTQ+ rights, and the Black Lives Matter movement. The conflict between the two companies became public in 2021 when Ben & Jerry's announced a decision to halt sales in Israeli-only settlements. Following this, in 2022, Unilever sold Ben & Jerry's intellectual property rights in those regions, a maneuver that the ice cream maker claims undermined their social initiatives.

Although a settlement was reached in December 2022, tensions remain high. Ben & Jerry's alleges that Unilever has interfered with their social advocacy efforts multiple times since then. The lawsuit details four separate instances where Unilever allegedly stopped Ben & Jerry's from making public statements about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Additionally, the complaint notes an incident where Unilever barred Ben & Jerry's from donating to Jewish Voices for Peace.

Ben & Jerry's contends that these actions by Unilever directly violate their agreement and contravene their long-established social mission. As the legal proceedings unfold, the iconic ice cream brand continues to push back against what it perceives as censorship by its corporate parent.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related