In a surprising turn of events, ESPN analyst Dan Orlovsky has expressed his disappointment over the Pittsburgh Steelers' supposed quarterback competition, claiming that the team "bamboozled" everyone. As the Steelers approach the decision of naming their starting quarterback, Orlovsky believes that the battle between Russell Wilson and Justin Fields was nothing more than a facade.

While many fans found the training camp skirmish between Wilson and Fields captivating, Orlovsky argues that the outcome was predetermined. He asserts that Wilson has always had the upper hand and that Fields was never truly in contention for the starting role. Orlovsky's remarks have left some fans feeling deceived and questioning the honesty surrounding the quarterback situation.

Throughout the offseason, Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin consistently highlighted Wilson's prominent position as the frontrunner. The term "pole position" was frequently used to describe Wilson's status, emphasizing his experience and track record of success. Tomlin never conveyed the impression that Fields was a genuine contender for the starting job.

Critics argue that while Fields possesses an undeniable spark and potential, Wilson's years of experience ultimately make him the safer choice. Despite being outperformed by Fields during training camp and the preseason, Wilson's Super Bowl pedigree and consistency have been decisive factors in Tomlin's decision-making process.

Orlovsky's assertion that he would have started Fields only adds fuel to the controversy. Fans are left pondering the possibility of a more electrifying offense with Fields at the helm, but the fear of disrupting team chemistry and creating a toxic atmosphere has ultimately swayed Tomlin's judgment.

The announcement of the Steelers' starting quarterback is imminent, and Tomlin's decision will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the team's performance in the upcoming season. While some may feel cheated by the lack of a legitimate quarterback competition, Tomlin's emphasis on experience over potential ensures a calculated approach in securing the Steelers' success.

As the football world eagerly awaits the outcome of this quarterback saga, the claims made by analysts like Dan Orlovsky leave fans wondering if there was indeed a deception at play. Regardless of the truth behind the alleged "bamboozling," it is clear that the Steelers' quarterback battle has sparked controversy and generated heightened anticipation among fans and spectators alike.

Note: This news article is created based on the information provided in the given text.