Trump's Artistic Defense: Real Estate as the Mona Lisas of Property
ICARO Media Group
In a recent video of a deposition obtained by CBS News, former president Donald Trump compared his real estate empire to works of art, calling them the "Mona Lisas" and "Renoirs" of property. The video was released as part of Trump's New York civil fraud case and showcased his firm belief in the value and artistic nature of his properties.
Trump emphasized that his properties were like paintings, as they didn't disrupt cash flow but could be sold for substantial sums of money. The deposition focused on the iconic properties at the center of the case, including Trump Towers, 40 Wall Street, Mar-a-Lago, Seven Springs, and the Turnberry golf course in Scotland.
The unexpected inclusion of art in a trial revolving around alleged fraudulent financial statements and property valuations caught many by surprise. Artist Isabelle Brourman, who sketched the trial, noted how art was used as a metaphor to explain breaking the rules. Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr., described his father as an "artist with real estate" and properties as a "canvas" for his father's artistry.
The trial, which lasted 44 days, had its fair share of theatrical moments. On the final day, Trump and his attorneys delivered impassioned closing arguments, while Judge Arthur Engoron received a bomb threat at his home that morning, adding another layer of drama to the proceedings.
Artist Isabelle Brourman, who provided sketches of the trial, considers her work an art project rather than traditional courtroom sketches intended for the news media. She aims to exhibit her art, documenting Trump's trials and presidential run, potentially at the 60 Centre Street Courthouse.
Brourman's sketches captured the essence of the courtroom and the powerful moments within it. Wearing bold outfits designed by Mia Vesper, she saw her attire as a secret messaging system, allowing her to feel empowered and make a statement within a space dominated by set power dynamics.
The timing of Brourman's interest in Trump coincided with his New York hush money arraignment, where she was captivated by his power and confidence. Since then, she has diligently documented the New York civil fraud trial, immersing herself in the history-making event.
Art became a recurring theme in the trial, surprising both Brourman and the observers. It was framed as the ultimate freedom, open to interpretation in the legal setting. Even Judge Engoron added a touch of wit, acknowledging the efforts of the sketch artists and humorously encouraging them to do a better job of capturing his face.
As the trial concluded, Trump's properties and real estate empire remained in jeopardy, with Attorney General Letitia James seeking a lifetime ban on Trump's involvement in New York's real estate industry. Having already been found liable for fraud, Trump vehemently denies any wrongdoing.
As the trial reached its conclusion, the role of art and Trump's artistic defense made for a captivating subplot in this high-stakes legal battle.