In a surprising slip of the tongue, President Joe Biden mistakenly referred to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi as "the president of Mexico" during a press conference aimed at addressing concerns over his mental competence. The incident took place during a speech about the Department of Justice investigation into his handling of government documents.

The mishap, which occurred on Thursday, prompted a shocked reaction from legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin during a live segment on CNN. Toobin struggled to suppress his disbelief as he discussed Biden's error.

In response to Toobin's remarks, Kate Bedingfield, the White House Communications Director, defended the president by explaining that Biden had misspoke in the name of the country while discussing efforts to provide humanitarian assistance to Gaza.

Bedingfield emphasized that while Biden may have wished he had said "Egypt" instead of "Mexico," it was a small misstatement that shouldn't be blown out of proportion.

The incident highlights the ongoing debate surrounding Biden's mental acuity, with critics often questioning his ability to effectively communicate and make sound decisions. Some argue that these verbal gaffes are signs of cognitive decline, while others argue that they are simply slips of the tongue.

The president's supporters argue that Biden's numerous policy initiatives and actions speak louder than the occasional misstatement. They contend that he is fully capable of carrying out his presidential duties and that focusing on isolated incidents undermines the substantive work being done by his administration.

Though the mistake may have caused some embarrassment and raised further questions about Biden's mental sharpness, it is important to note that it does not directly impact his ability to govern or make policy decisions.

As the Biden administration continues to navigate various challenges both domestically and internationally, it remains to be seen how this incident will impact public perception of the president. In the coming days, it is likely that both critics and supporters will use this slip-up as fuel for their respective arguments.