Oregon Supreme Court Declines to Hear Trump Ballot Challenge in 2024 Republican Primary

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/15989088/original/open-uri20240112-17-1do2xx6?1705088057
ICARO Media Group
Politics
12/01/2024 19h33

In a recent development, the Oregon Supreme Court has decided not to hear a challenge that aimed to prevent Former President Donald Trump from appearing on the Oregon 2024 Republican primary and general election ballot. The court made the announcement on Friday in response to the request of five voters who sought to disqualify Trump under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The specific section of the amendment states that individuals who took an oath to support the Constitution and then engaged in insurrection against it will be barred from holding office. However, the Oregon Supreme Court did not find sufficient grounds to disqualify Trump from the ballot, declining the voters' request.

Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, in accordance with Oregon law, reiterated that she had no authority to consider Trump's eligibility to serve as President at the primary election stage. The Secretary of State made a similar statement at the end of November, expressing her expectation that Trump would appear on the primary ballot unless directed otherwise by the court.

As per the election schedule, Oregon's presidential primary ballots must be finalized by March 21, 2024. This means that Trump's inclusion on the ballot will be determined before this crucial deadline.

Although the challenge brought by the five voters did not lead to Trump's removal from the primary ballot, it underscores the ongoing debates surrounding his eligibility for future political participation. The result of this decision by the Oregon Supreme Court may have implications for the state's 2024 Republican primary as well as the general election.

As the election process unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the issue of Trump's eligibility shapes the political landscape in Oregon and beyond.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related