In a controversial move, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt has signed an executive order effectively banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at agencies and public colleges and universities across the state. The order requires the 25 public institutions to provide reports detailing the expenditure of their former DEI initiatives and job positions, with Stitt citing the need to protect taxpayer dollars.

However, according to local news outlet KFOR, the total expenditure on DEI programs over the past decade amounted to a meager $10.2 million, comprising just three-tenths of one percent of the total higher education spending. This raises questions about the necessity of the ban, as DEI programs typically provide support not only for students from marginalized communities but also for veterans, low-income students, first-generation students, single parents, and students with disabilities.

Governor Stitt argues that the focus should instead be on supporting low-income and first-generation students, regardless of their race. But critics of the executive order argue that DEI initiatives play a vital role in providing a safe and inclusive space for minority and marginalized communities on college campuses.

Joseph Harroz Jr, the president of the University of Oklahoma, responded to the executive order by assuring the OU community of the university's commitment to accessible education. Harroz emphasized that key values such as access and opportunity for all, being a place of belonging, dedication to free speech and inquiry, and civility in treatment of others are unwavering.

The University of Oklahoma's Black emergency response team, a student organization focused on activism, advocacy, and social justice, released a statement expressing concerns over the executive order. The group highlighted the significance of DEI departments, programs, and entities in providing a platform for students to voice their concerns and foster unity within the student life community. They argue that any attempt to remove personnel, funding, and programming jeopardizes the existence of these vital spaces.

The ban on DEI programs in Oklahoma is part of a growing trend across the United States. Earlier this year, Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis signed bills prohibiting the use of federal or state funds for DEI initiatives. Similarly, the Iowa Board of Regents voted last month to direct public universities to cut DEI programs that are deemed unnecessary for research contracts or accreditation. In Wisconsin, Republicans successfully pushed for a freeze on DEI staffing at the University of Wisconsin through 2026 and the elimination or refocusing of approximately 40 positions focused on diversity.

As the debate surrounding DEI programs continues, advocates emphasize the importance of ensuring equal access and support for all students, regardless of their background or identity. The ban in Oklahoma raises concerns about the potential negative impact on marginalized communities and the future of inclusive higher education in the state.