A new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change reveals that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine has resulted in missing data from Russian stations in the Arctic, significantly hampering the study of climate change in the region. Since the start of the conflict in February 2022, no data has been released from these stations, limiting the ability to accurately describe Arctic conditions and potentially biasing the view on Arctic change.

The authors of the paper highlight the negative impact of excluding Russian stations on the representativeness of data, stating that some biases are comparable to the expected climate change shifts by the end of the century. With Russia being the largest Arctic country among the eight nations within the Arctic Circle, the absence of data from these stations poses a significant challenge to understanding and quantifying the future of climate change in the region.

The Arctic Council, an intergovernmental forum that coordinates Arctic activities and research, was paused following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. While it has recently resumed without Russia's participation, international scientists have been deprived of crucial data from the Russian section of the Arctic. This missing data includes measurements of annual average temperature, total precipitation, snow depth, soil moisture, vegetation, biomass, and soil carbon, impeding a balanced analysis of climate change effects.

Ground-based observations from research stations play a vital role in comprehending Arctic change, complementing remote estimations. However, as ground-based data will primarily come from non-Russian parts of the Arctic, the overall ability to monitor the status and trajectory of the Arctic biome may be severely limited in the foreseeable future.

The study of Arctic climate change is of utmost importance, as the region is experiencing warming at two to four times the average global rate. By excluding Russian data, a bias in climate forecasting within the Arctic ecosystem variables has been amplified, further affecting the accuracy of climate predictions.

The authors emphasize the need for research stations to be distributed across the entire Arctic region, as the limited number of stations, concentrated in certain areas, has already resulted in clumped and potentially non-representative data. The absence of Siberian research stations, known for their valuable contributions to understanding thawing permafrost, biodiversity shifts, and carbon dynamics, particularly hampers the ability to track global implications of climate change.

This study draws attention to the knowledge gap caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and underscores the importance of comprehensive and widespread data collection in the Arctic. Understanding the changing Arctic climate is essential for developing effective strategies to mitigate the impact of climate change on a global scale.

As the study highlights the significance of Arctic research, it calls for the establishment of an optimal statistically determined sampling regime comprising a network of research stations across the Arctic region. This would enhance the representativeness and accuracy of data, facilitating a deeper understanding of the Arctic's response to climate change.

The implications of the missing Russian data on the study of Arctic climate change underscore the need for international collaboration and continued efforts to ensure comprehensive data collection in this ecologically crucial region.

Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about the Arctic? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.