In a recent report by ProPublica, new information has emerged regarding the financial dealings and ethical concerns surrounding Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. The report reveals Thomas' efforts to secure a raise in his salary, along with his questionable relationships with wealthy conservatives, all while accumulating significant debt.

The incident in question occurred in January 2000, when Thomas spoke to Republican Florida Rep. Cliff Stearns during a return flight from a conservative conference in Sea Island, Georgia. During their conversation, Thomas expressed his dissatisfaction with his salary and the need for a pay increase. Rep. Stearns later offered to explore the possibility of raising the salaries of Supreme Court justices through legislation.

This conversation was disclosed in a confidential memo authored by court administrator L. Ralph Mecham and relayed to then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist. The memo also highlighted Thomas' discussions with appellate Judge David Hansen about lifting the court's ban on justices giving paid speeches. Mecham raised concerns about the potential backlash such legislation could cause, both within the judiciary and in Congress.

Although Rep. Stearns' attempts to change the compensation structure for Supreme Court justices did not come to fruition, Thomas' desire for a more lavish lifestyle remained unchanged. Reports indicate that Thomas was facing financial difficulties, struggling to sustain his extravagant tastes on his salary of $173,600 (approximately $300,000 in today's terms). Prior to his conversation with Rep. Stearns, Thomas had borrowed a substantial amount of money, $267,230, from his wealthy friend Anthony Welters to purchase a luxury RV.

These financial dealings with Welters were just the beginning of a pattern that would emerge over time. It was discovered that Thomas had engaged in financial deals with other influential conservatives, including billionaire Harlan Crow, who provided him with private jet rides, luxury vacations, and even purchased real estate directly from the justice. Further investigations unveiled Thomas' ties to powerful figures such as the Koch brothers, oil tycoon Paul "Tony" Novelly, H. Wayne Huizenga, and investor David Sokol.

The revelations regarding Thomas' financial entanglements and ethical concerns have put significant pressure on the Supreme Court. As a result, the Court adopted its first-ever independent code of ethics in November. However, this code, albeit vague, does not mandate disclosures from the justices. With the standard of avoiding the "appearance of impropriety," it becomes evident that Justice Thomas may be in violation.

The controversy surrounding Justice Clarence Thomas’ finances raises questions about transparency and potential conflicts of interest within the Supreme Court. As public scrutiny continues, it remains to be seen how these revelations will impact Thomas' reputation and the court's commitment to maintaining ethical standards.