Uzcategui. The decision came after the judge determined that Allman and his legal team had not been provided with the necessary documents to adequately prepare their case, as reported by NBC News.

Cher initially filed the petition in late December, expressing concerns about Allman's ability to handle his own assets. Citing his ongoing mental health and substance abuse issues, she worried that any funds distributed to him from his trust fund would be immediately spent on drugs, risking his life and leaving him with no assets to provide for himself.

Allman, who currently receives money from a trust left by his late father, musician Gregg Allman, spoke on his own behalf in regards to his mother's request. In a court filing prior to the hearing, he acknowledged his mother's love and support but stated that he did not need her unsolicited help or support at this time.

During the hearing, Cher's attorney, Gabrielle Vidal, argued that granting conservatorship over Allman's finances was crucial, describing it as a "life-and-death proposition." However, Judge Uzcategui was not convinced.

The judge's decision has implications for Allman's financial future, as the pending payment from his trust fund will not be placed under the control of a conservator. The ruling highlights the importance of ensuring all parties have a fair opportunity to present their case in court.

This denial of Cher's request for conservatorship emphasizes the complexity of family dynamics and legal matters surrounding the management of personal assets. The ruling serves as a reminder that proper documentation and presenting a strong case are essential in court proceedings.

In the aftermath of this decision, it remains to be seen how Cher and Allman will navigate their family and financial relationship moving forward.