Iowa state officials have announced that the state will not be participating in the 2024 Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children (Summer EBT) program, a federal initiative that provides $40 per month to each child in low-income families to assist with food costs during the summer break from school. The decision has generated mixed reactions from lawmakers and stakeholders.

The Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Education in Iowa released a news statement on Friday, informing the U.S. Department of Agriculture about the state's choice to not participate in the program. Governor Kim Reynolds, a Republican, explained the reasoning behind the decision, stating that federal cash benefit programs implemented during the COVID-19 era are not sustainable and fail to offer long-term solutions. Governor Reynolds expressed concern that an EBT card does not promote nutrition and cited the rising issue of childhood obesity as a pressing concern.

One key factor influencing Iowa’s decision is the requirement for participating states to cover half of the administrative costs. The estimated $2.2 million cost for Iowa was cited as a deterrent. Democratic Senator Izaah Knox of Des Moines voiced disappointment, criticizing the administration for rejecting federal funds that could have a significant impact on providing necessary food assistance for hungry children. Sen. Knox expressed concern about the potential negative effects on children and families across the state.

In a similar development, neighboring Nebraska also declared it would not participate in the Summer EBT program. Gov. Jim Pillen, a Republican, cited his belief in finding alternative solutions and his opposition to welfare as the primary reasons behind the decision. Nebraska will, however, remain engaged in the Summer Food Service Program, which combines activities like reading, physical education, and nutrition education with food assistance.

The decision by both Iowa and Nebraska has prompted a bipartisan group of lawmakers in Nebraska to appeal for a reconsideration. These lawmakers argue that the Summer EBT program would address the needs of vulnerable children and also benefit the state's economy. The ongoing debate highlights the differing perspectives on the best approach to support low-income families during the summer months when children may not have access to school-provided meals.

At present, at least 18 states and territories, along with the Cherokee and Chickasaw Nations, have indicated their intent to participate in the Summer EBT program for 2024. The National Conference of State Legislatures has published a list that includes Arizona, California, Kansas, Minnesota, West Virginia, American Samoa, and Guam, among others.

States, territories, and eligible tribal nations have until January 1 to officially inform the Department of Agriculture of their decision to participate or opt-out of the Summer EBT program for this summer.