Giuliani Ordered to Pay $148 Million in Damages to Georgia Election Workers for Defamation and Emotional Distress

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/15939539/original/open-uri20231215-56-1140e00?1702679291
ICARO Media Group
Politics
15/12/2023 21h56

Washington, D.C. - In a landmark verdict, a federal jury has ordered Rudy Giuliani, former lawyer for President Donald Trump, to pay $148 million in damages to Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea "Shaye" Moss, two Georgia election workers. The jury found Giuliani liable for defamation, punitive damages, and emotional distress caused by his repeated false accusations of election fraud during the contentious 2020 presidential election.

The eight-person jury reached their decision after a four-day trial, during which Freeman and Moss testified about the horrifying consequences of Giuliani's lies. They detailed how his support of Trump's baseless claims of a stolen election led to a deluge of racist and violent threats, upending their lives and forcing them to endure constant fear and harassment.

The damages awarded to Freeman and Moss were divided into three categories. Each plaintiff was granted $20 million for emotional distress, and collectively, they were awarded $75 million in punitive damages. Additionally, Freeman received just over $16 million in defamation damages, while Moss was granted close to $17 million.

Giuliani, taken aback by the staggering amount, referred to the dollar figure as "absurd" and declared his intention to appeal the verdict. His attorney, Joseph Sibley, argued that such a large verdict would effectively destroy Giuliani's reputation and future prospects. Sibley acknowledged Giuliani's wrongful conduct but urged the jury to consider his lifetime achievements.

The trial shed light on the ordeal Freeman and Moss endured due to Giuliani's unfounded claims. Freeman testified that she was terrorized by Trump supporters to the extent that she was forced to abandon her home. The emotional toll was evident as Freeman emotionally described feeling scared and constantly fearing for her safety. Her attorney, Michael Gottlieb, implored the jury to send a resounding message with their verdict, emphasizing that Giuliani had no right to subject innocent individuals to a virtual mob.

The case against Giuliani gained traction when U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell found him liable for defamation after repeatedly disregarding court orders to provide evidence to Freeman and Moss. The judge admonished Giuliani for bypassing due process and emphasized the serious consequences of such actions.

Giuliani's false allegations against Freeman and Moss persisted despite multiple investigations and findings affirming their innocence. He even presented a heavily edited clip of security footage, falsely claiming it showed the pair engaging in fraudulent activities during ballot-counting operations. As it turned out, Moss clarified to the court that the alleged "USB drive" was actually a ginger mint.

The jury's sole determination was to decide on the appropriate amount of damages to be awarded. The substantial sum of $148 million underscores the serious harm caused by Giuliani's defamatory statements and the resulting emotional distress suffered by Freeman and Moss.

The case serves as a noteworthy reminder of the consequences that individuals may face for spreading baseless claims and engaging in defamation. The significant verdict sends a powerful message that defamation, particularly when it incites threats and harassment, will not be tolerated in the pursuit of truth and justice.

Giuliani's decision not to testify during the trial and the revelation of the extent of the harm inflicted on Freeman and Moss only solidified the jury's decision in favor of the plaintiffs. As the case moves forward with the appeal process, the precedent set by this verdict may have far-reaching implications for future defamation cases.

(Note: This article has been generated based on the information provided. Any opinions or statements within the article are not representative of actual events or individuals.)

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related