U.S. Gymnast Jordan Chiles at Risk of Losing Olympic Bronze Medal

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16317873/original/open-uri20240810-56-1u00fur?1723319812
ICARO Media Group
News
10/08/2024 19h46

In a surprising turn of events, U.S. gymnast Jordan Chiles faces the possibility of losing her hard-earned bronze medal at the Paris Olympics 2024. Chiles, who was awarded third place in the floor exercise final, is now the center of a contentious battle between her coach, the Romanian team, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

It all started when Chiles' coach filed an appeal of her score to the judges, arguing that she deserved a higher rating. As a result, Chiles moved up to the podium, displacing a Romanian gymnast. However, the Romanian team quickly retaliated, claiming that the appeal was filed four seconds too late.

Recently, the CAS ruled in favor of the Romanians, stating that the appeal was indeed filed after the designated time frame. Consequently, they decided to retract the 0.1 points that were initially awarded to Chiles, reverting her score back to its previous value of 13.666.

However, it is not solely up to the CAS to determine whether Chiles will retain her medal. The CAS panel has left this decision to the International Gymnastics Federation (FIG), which will now ascertain the final ranking of the three gymnasts in question, including Chiles, and assign the medals accordingly, adhering to the CAS ruling.

Prior to the appeal, Chiles had secured the fifth spot in the rankings. However, a review by the judging panel discovered that she had not received the full points for a skill in her routine. This revelation led to a revised score of 13.766, placing Chiles onto the podium at the expense of two Romanian gymnasts, Sabrina Maneca-Voinea and Ana Bărbosu.

Interestingly, Chiles' teammate and training mate, Simone Biles, clinched the silver medal in the same floor exercise final, while Brazil's Rebeca Andrade claimed the gold. Shortly after the CAS decision was announced, Chiles took to Instagram, posting a story with four broken heart emojis, indicating her disappointment with the turn of events.

The CAS panel not only nullified Chiles' appeal but also dismissed two other appeals made by the Romanian team. One of the appeals sought the reinstatement of a 0.1 point penalty incurred for stepping out of bounds during Maneca-Voinea's routine, claiming it was unjustified. Additionally, the Romanian team requested that Chiles, Maneca-Voinea, and Bărbosu all be awarded bronze medals and placed in third position.

In response to the CAS ruling, USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee expressed their devastation. They stated that the appeal was filed in good faith, in accordance with FIG rules, to ensure fair and accurate scoring. The organizations commended Chiles for her integrity throughout the process and condemned the baseless attacks she has endured on social media.

Chiles herself has been vocal about the abuse and racism she has encountered in the gymnastics world. She has faced further attacks on social media since the controversial appeal on Monday. Notably, Romanian gymnastics icon Nadia Comăneci, the first gymnast to achieve a "perfect 10," weighed in on the matter, claiming that Maneca-Voinea was wrongly penalized for going out of bounds during her routine.

The prime minister of Romania, Marcel Ciolacu, publicly announced his intention to boycott the Olympic closing ceremony in protest of the floor final's outcome. Ciolacu expressed his dissatisfaction with withdrawing a medal earned through honest work based on an appeal that lacked clarity and understanding.

In response to the outrage, the president of the Romanian Olympic and Sports Committee has submitted a "letter of protest," urging the International Gymnastics Federation to reevaluate the exercise.

As the gymnastics world eagerly awaits the decision of the FIG regarding the final medal ranking, the fate of Jordan Chiles' Olympic bronze hangs in the balance, leaving fans and athletes alike on the edge of their seats.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related