Supreme Court Puts Controversial Texas Immigration Law on Hold

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16091054/original/open-uri20240305-71-7qsedd?1709671725
ICARO Media Group
Politics
05/03/2024 20h46

In a recent development, the United States Supreme Court has decided to temporarily halt the implementation of Texas' immigration-enforcement law, Senate Bill 4 (SB 4). The court's decision came in response to a federal appeals court ruling that would have allowed the law to go into effect as early as this weekend.

The court's decision means that SB 4 will remain on hold until at least 5 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, March 13. This move by the Supreme Court came after a series of events that unfolded over the weekend, beginning with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals setting aside a lower court ruling to suspend the law during an ongoing lawsuit.

Senate Bill 4, passed by the Texas Legislature in late 2022, was initially scheduled to take effect on Tuesday, March 5. The law aimed to empower local and state police to arrest individuals suspected of being in the country illegally, as well as allowing local judges to order migrants to return to Mexico.

However, U.S. District Judge David Ezra temporarily blocked the implementation of the law on February 29, citing concerns over its potential unconstitutionality due to the federal government's jurisdiction over immigration matters. Texas promptly appealed this ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which subsequently suspended Ezra's decision and postponed its own ruling for a week to allow the Biden administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Department of Justice then approached the Supreme Court on Monday, requesting that the Fifth Circuit Court's decision be vacated and that SB 4 be temporarily suspended. In its filing, the Biden administration reiterated arguments made in federal court last month, stating that the law conflicts with the federal government's immigration enforcement role, which has been longstanding policy for over 150 years.

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the appeals court acted hastily and failed to consider the detailed reasoning provided by Judge Ezra in his previous decision. The Supreme Court, in turn, decided to pause the law until March 13 while it considers whether to allow it to take effect during the ongoing case.

The lawsuit challenging SB 4 was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Texas and the Texas Civil Rights Project on behalf of several organizations, including the Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, American Gateways, and El Paso County. The defendants in the case include Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw and El Paso County District Attorney Bill Hicks. At the time of writing, there has been no immediate response from the attorneys representing the ACLU of Texas and Las Americas regarding the latest proceedings.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who has been a proponent of the legislation, has expressed that Texas has the right to defend itself against what he perceives as the Biden administration's open-border policies. Governor Abbott has anticipated that the legality of SB 4 may ultimately be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The pause in the implementation of Texas' controversial immigration-enforcement law will give the Supreme Court an opportunity to carefully weigh the merits and potential consequences of SB 4, setting the stage for a crucial legal battle in the coming weeks.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related