In a recent episode of "The View," the co-hosts discussed the Supreme Court's unanimous decision against removing former President Trump from the ballot in Colorado. While they agreed that the court made the right decision, concerns were raised about partisanship and the potential implications of the ruling.

Co-host Sunny Hostin commended the court's decision, but criticized the justices for what she perceived as partisan behavior. Hostin highlighted the concurring opinion written by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, who argued that the court exceeded its scope in answering a question not before them. They claimed that the ruling inadvertently shielded alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to holding federal office.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was nominated by Trump, also issued her own concurring opinion, which seemed to align with Kagan, Jackson, and Sotomayor. This alignment was perceived as a reassurance by co-host Sara Haines, who often discusses partisanship on the court. Haines stated that she understood the potential chaos that would ensue from a different outcome but emphasized the importance of considering opposing states' perspectives and potential actions.

Co-host Ana Navarro agreed with the Supreme Court ruling, emphasizing that it should be up to the voters to decide. She expressed concern about opening a "Pandora's box" and echoed the sentiment that Justice Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from cases involving Trump.

While co-host Whoopi Goldberg regarded the ruling as "probably the right decision," she expressed her dislike for Trump being "normalized." Goldberg highlighted her irritation with the normalization of Trump and his behavior and questioned the current actions vis-à-vis the law.

Alyssa Farah Griffin, a former Trump aide turned strong Republican critic, mentioned that although the decision was the right one, it was not a "welcome one." All nine justices ruled in favor of Trump, impacting efforts to remove him from the 2024 ballot in multiple states. The court examined the meaning and reach of Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits former officeholders engaged in insurrection from holding public office again.

The Supreme Court's ruling has ignited a debate on partisanship within the court. While some agreed with the decision, concerns were voiced about exceeding the court's role and the potential normalization of former President Trump. With challenges filed in over 30 states to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot, the implications of this decision are far-reaching and will continue to be a topic of discussion.

- Fox News' Anders Hagstrom and Brianna Herlihy contributed to this report.