Manhattan District Attorney's Office Considers Delay in Trump's Hush Money Trial

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16108729/original/open-uri20240314-18-kw7ess?1710447283
ICARO Media Group
Politics
14/03/2024 20h12

In a recent court filing, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office has expressed its willingness to postpone the scheduled criminal trial regarding hush money payments made by former President Donald Trump. The trial, which is set to begin on March 25, could potentially be delayed for a period of up to 30 days.

Trump's defense teams have consistently sought to defer the trials beyond the election, and this unexpected move by the prosecution team raises doubts about the commencement date of what was supposed to be the first trial. The proposed delay is primarily to allow for a comprehensive review of new materials recently provided by federal prosecutors.

According to the court filing, the U.S. attorney's office delivered approximately 31,000 pages of discovery material on Wednesday and is expected to provide additional evidence. While the district attorney's office has affirmed its preparedness to proceed with the trial on March 25, they have presented no opposition to an adjournment to ensure that the defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials.

Conversely, Trump's attorneys have requested a more substantial delay of 90 days or even the dismissal of the case altogether. Their argument stems from the recent influx of records produced by federal prosecutors within the past ten days, as outlined in the district attorney's letter.

This development comes as the case garners nationwide attention, and its outcome could have significant implications for Trump's legal standing. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office has not yet made a decision regarding the requested delay, but it is expected to be a topic of deliberation in the coming days.

As this story is still developing, further updates will be provided as new information becomes available.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related