In a move that has ignited a firestorm of criticism, King County Sheriff Patti Cole-Tindall has instructed her deputies to disregard a recently passed ordinance by the Burien City Council. The controversial decision, which came to light through a leaked email obtained by The Jason Rantz Show on KTTH, has raised questions about the sheriff's loyalty to King County Executive Dow Constantine and the consequences of appointing rather than electing a sheriff.

The ordinance in question aimed to ban homeless encampments within 500 feet of schools, libraries, parks, and other areas with vulnerable populations in Burien. However, Cole-Tindall deemed the city's ordinance to be unconstitutional, despite no judicial ruling to support her claim. Critics argue that the sheriff's action reflects her allegiance to Constantine rather than serving the public's best interests.

The ban itself includes a provision that only applies when sufficient shelter beds are available, aligning with a court decision currently under appeal at the U.S. Supreme Court. However, the sheriff's refusal to enforce the ordinance has triggered concerns that she is prioritizing political considerations over public safety.

Former King County Sheriff John Urquhart weighed in on the controversy, suggesting that the decision not to enforce the ordinance appears to be driven by Executive Constantine. Moreover, Urquhart pointed out that the executive branch typically does not have the authority to make constitutional determinations, a role traditionally assigned to the courts. Urquhart called for greater transparency, urging Cole-Tindall to release all guidance received and put to rest rumors of Constantine's involvement.

This development has sparked broader concerns about the decision to transition from electing to appointing the position of county sheriff. Constantine had promised voters in 2020 that an outsider could be brought in to run the department if given the power, suggesting a bait-and-switch tactic implemented to maintain control and further political objectives. With the sheriff's position being no longer subject to direct voter influence, critics argue that abuses of power and partisan interference may become more prevalent.

The consequences of Cole-Tindall's directive are not limited to the immediate aftermath in Burien. Observers have expressed apprehension about the potential for further selective enforcement of laws based on political considerations. The controversial move highlights concerns over Constantine's reputation for being vindictive and hyperpartisan, leading to questions about the future of law enforcement in King County under his administration.

As the controversy continues to unfold, there are growing calls for greater transparency and accountability from the sheriff. The Burien City Council and local leaders have expressed disappointment in the sheriff's decision and hope for a resolution that upholds the rule of law while addressing the issue of homelessness in a comprehensive and compassionate manner.

The implications of this recent development extend beyond the borders of Burien, as the role and authority of the sheriff are called into question. It remains to be seen how this clash between local governance and county leadership will be resolved and what it means for the future of law enforcement in King County.