**Elon Musk’s X Change Sparks Controversy Over Block Functionality Update**

In a controversial move, X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, has altered its block functionality to let blocked users view posts made by the accounts that blocked them. This update, announced by X's engineering team, allows blocked users to access public posts without engaging in any form of interaction such as likes, replies, or reposts.

X defended the change by claiming that the previous block function could be misused to conceal harmful or private information. According to the platform, the new adjustment aims to promote transparency by enabling blocked users to verify if they are being wrongfully targeted or mentioned in posts. Elon Musk, the owner of X, has previously questioned the efficacy of blocking public posts, advocating instead for a more powerful muting system.

Despite the justification, the update has led to significant backlash from users. Critics argue that many people rely on the block function for safety, using it to shield themselves from harassment and stalking. Allowing blocked users to view posts could compromise safety by enabling malicious actors to screenshot and share content. One user remarked that the block button has essentially become a "glorified mute button."

The functionality prior to this update ensured that blocked accounts couldn't see or search for the content of those who had blocked them while logged into X. These restrictions have been removed from X’s support page, though blocked accounts are still unable to engage with posts or add the blocker to lists, as well as send direct messages. Also, posts from blocked accounts remain hidden from a user's timeline.

Claire Waxman, the Victims' Commissioner in the London mayor's office, severely criticized the policy change, highlighting its potential risks. She emphasized how enabling blocked users to view posts could cater to stalkers and abusers, compromising victims' safety. Tracy Chou, CEO of Block Party, also pointed out that while block evasions may have always been possible, reducing the effort required for such actions only makes the platform less safe.

Concerns have also been raised regarding compliance with app store policies. Both Apple and Google mandate that social networking apps must have mechanisms to block abusive users, prompting questions about whether X’s new policy adheres to these requirements.