In a surprising turn of events at UFC 305, one judge's questionable scoring left the entire MMA community perplexed. Judge Howie Booth's decision to award Tai Tuivasa a unanimous 30-27 victory over Jairzinho Rozenstruik in the battle of heavyweight contenders has raised eyebrows and drawn criticism from both fighters and fans.

Despite his dominant performance, Rozenstruik was denied a decisive victory as Booth's scorecard significantly differed from the consensus view. Many spectators were left scratching their heads as Rozenstruik outclassed Tuivasa throughout the bout, displaying superior technique and control.

The controversy did not end with the judge's ruling, as UFC 305's broadcast revealed that Booth had been removed from his duties for the co-main event between Kai Kara-France and Steve Erceg. The decision to replace him was seen as a necessary step to maintain the integrity of the judging process and prevent further dubious calls.

The MMA community wasted no time in expressing their astonishment and frustration on social media platforms. Jairzinho Rozenstruik himself took to Twitter to react, humorously questioning whether the judge was "high" during the fight. Fellow fighters such as Belal Muhammad, Stefan Struve, Derek Brunson, and Mike Pierce also voiced their disbelief at the scorecard, labeling it as a "drunk judge" decision and questioning the competence of some UFC judges.

The incident reignited the ongoing debate surrounding the accountability and transparency of MMA judges. Mike Jackson, Esq., pointed out the inconsistency in judging decisions, while Jared Gordon shared a meme illustrating the perceived lack of control over judges' actions.

The controversial scoring raised concerns about the potential impact on fighters' careers, as Tai Tuivasa's victory was met with skepticism due to the wide margin decision. Fans and professionals alike called for a thorough review of the judging system in order to ensure fairness and accuracy in determining fight outcomes.

The UFC is yet to publicly address the issue, but this incident serves as a reminder that the MMA community remains vigilant in advocating for trustworthy and competent judging, commensurate with the skill and dedication exhibited by the fighters inside the Octagon.