Chicago's Parking Meter Privatization: An Expensive Financial Lesson

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16539902/original/open-uri20250608-18-8gq7ym?1749363790
ICARO Media Group
Politics
08/06/2025 06h17

### Chicago's Costly Lesson: Privatized Parking Meters Prove a Financial Misstep

Amid financial desperation during the 2008 economic crisis, Chicago sought quick revenue solutions to avoid raising property taxes. Then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public infrastructure, leading to a long-term lease of the city's 36,000 parking meters to the investment group Chicago Parking Meters LLC, led by Morgan Stanley. The deal brought the city $1.157 billion upfront, but the consequences have been far-reaching.

The decision, rushed through the City Council with a 40-5 vote, was later criticized for its lack of scrutiny. Analysts, including a report from 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack, revealed that Chicago potentially lost out on billions. The projected value of the deal could have been between $5 to $10 billion over its 75-year term. Meanwhile, the then-inspector general estimated the city was underpaid by at least $974 million.

A recent audit by KPMG in 2024 discovered that the private investors have already recouped their initial $1.157 billion just 17 years into the deal. In 2023 alone, the meters generated a record $160.9 million, totaling $1.97 billion in revenue since the agreement began. With 58 years left on the lease, the city's financial decision continues to have long-term repercussions.

Chicago's scenario mirrors the financial predicaments of many individuals. According to the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households report, almost 37% of adults would struggle to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings. The trend of making financially imprudent decisions under pressure is not unique to large cities but is a common challenge for many Americans.

To avoid such pitfalls, financial advisors recommend building emergency funds and exploring less costly borrowing options. Should Chicago’s challenges serve as a cautionary tale, individuals and cities alike must plan cautiously to avoid repeating such expensive missteps.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related