Alabama Supreme Court Rules Embryos Created Through IVF Are Considered People in Landmark Decision

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16064123/original/open-uri20240219-18-9x9kex?1708379216
ICARO Media Group
Politics
19/02/2024 21h28

In a groundbreaking ruling, the Alabama Supreme Court has declared that embryos created through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) are now legally recognized as people. The historical decision stems from lawsuits filed by three couples against a fertility clinic in Mobile, Alabama, following an incident in December 2020. The plaintiffs alleged that a patient gained unauthorized access to the clinic's freezer where the embryos were stored, causing their demise after being dropped on the floor due to freeze burns.

Associate Justice Jay Mitchell, in the majority opinion, emphasized that unborn children, including fertilized eggs and embryos, are considered "children" under Alabama's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act without exceptions. Legal experts believe this ruling could have significant implications not only in Alabama but also nationwide.

The appeals, which were initially dismissed in 2022 by a circuit court judge, were brought to the state's highest court, known for its history of treating "unborn children" as children in both civil and criminal law cases. The potential consequences for fertility doctors in the state have been a point of concern, with the Alabama Medical Association highlighting the absurdity of extending wrongful death liability to preserved embryos indefinitely.

Advocates have raised concerns about the broader impact on fertility medicine, families utilizing IVF treatments, and the legal landscape surrounding reproductive rights. The ruling could set a precedent for future legal battles related to embryos, fetuses, and anti-abortion arguments, invoking constitutional considerations such as the equal protection clause.

The decision has sparked debates about the rights and status of embryos created through assisted reproductive technologies, with implications beyond just legal ramifications. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, the ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court has positioned itself as a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding reproductive rights and the definition of personhood in the eyes of the law.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related