In a recent Twitter debate sparked by a user questioning whether a goalkeeper captain could designate another player to handle interactions with referees, online discussions delved into the potential role of a "stand-in sh*thouse" in soccer. While some fans supported the idea of having a designated player assist the goalkeeper captain, others highlighted the complexities and strategies that could come into play.

The conversation pivoted towards the impact such a rule change could have on referee interactions, game management, and the overall conduct on the field. Suggestions ranged from introducing yellow cards for approaching referees to implementing stricter rules around dissent towards officials.

Moreover, fans also advocated for amplified efforts to curb time-wasting tactics and fake injuries in MLS matches. They applauded the league's willingness to adapt and innovate in order to improve the quality of play and uphold the integrity of the game.

Interestingly, comparisons were drawn to rugby, where players are more restricted in their interactions with match officials. Closed discussions between captains and referees and the idea of introducing temporary player suspensions for certain infractions were seen as potential enhancements for soccer.

Despite varying opinions on the practicality and necessity of allowing a designated intermediary for goalkeeper captains, it raised pertinent questions regarding the dynamics of on-field communications and the role of captains in soccer.

As MLS continues to explore ways to refine its rules and regulations, the concept of a designated liaison for goalkeeper captains could spark further dialogue on enhancing the game's professionalism and sportsmanship.

It remains to be seen whether such a proposal, born from a single Twitter query, could potentially influence the future landscape of Major League Soccer and the broader world of soccer regulations.