Ridley Scott Dismisses French Critics of His Film Napoleon
ICARO Media Group
Ridley Scott, the renowned filmmaker, continues to show his indifference towards the criticism surrounding his latest film, Napoleon. After recently urging viewers to "get a life" over their fixation on historical inaccuracies, Scott has now responded dismissively to French critics who have labeled his film as "very anti-French and very pro-British."
In a recent interview with the BBC, Scott boldly stated, "The French don't even like themselves. The audience that I showed it to in Paris, they loved it." This comes as a response to various French publications, including Le Figaro and French GQ, which openly mocked the film. Le Figaro went as far as to sarcastically suggest the film could be called "Barbie and Ken under the Empire."
Scott's film, starring Joaquin Phoenix as the titular French military leader and emperor, has had a troubled relationship with French historians in the past. In August, Scott compared Napoleon to despots like Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, much to the dismay of Napoleon's defenders. Pierre Branda, the academic director of the research nonprofit Fondation Napoléon, pointed out the disparity in perspective, noting that while Hitler and Stalin wrought destruction, Napoleon's legacy includes significant accomplishments that continue to influence the world today.
Even in the face of criticism, Scott remains unbothered by opinions about his research. When challenged by TV historian Dan Snow, who highlighted inaccuracies in the film's trailer, Scott retorted, "Were you there? Oh, you weren't there. Then how do you know?" It seems that the director is keen to dismiss any critiques that may question the authenticity of his portrayal.
It appears that Ridley Scott is determined to stand his ground despite the backlash. While the French critics continue to voice their concerns, Scott remains resolute in his belief that his film accurately depicts Napoleon's story. Whether audiences will ultimately embrace his interpretation or side with the dissenting voices is yet to be seen.